Yo’oko, a Jaguar that once Roamed the United States, has been Killed

A newly-released photo of a jaguar pelt is widely believed to be that of Yo’oko, a jaguar who had previously been seen in the United States. This skull did not belong to Yo’oko. Image courtesy of Richard Mahler.

This is not the sort of story I like to share. Since 1996, seven male jaguars (Panthera onca) have been confirmed in the United States. This provided some hope that the species, which once ranged widely throughout the southwestern US, might eventually recolonize parts of their former range. Unfortunately, one of those jaguars has been killed.

The Northern Jaguar Project (NJP) recently sent a photo of a jaguar pelt to the Arizona Daily Star. The NJP’s biologists, six members of the Arizona Game and Fish Department, and a retired US Fish and Wildlife biologist have all looked at the picture. They have concluded that the spot pattern matches that of Yo’oko, a jaguar who was repeatedly photographed in the Huachuca Mountains of Arizona.

Yo’oko was first photographed in the Huachucas on December 1, 2016. Then, in 2017, the Center for Biological Diversity and Conservation CATalyst arranged for students at Hiaki High School in Tucson to give the jaguar a name. Many of the students at that school are members of the Yaqui tribe, and they chose the name “Yo’oko:” meaning “jaguar” in Yaqui.

Jaguars are endangered in both the US and Mexico, so killing them is illegal in both countries. Jim DeVos of Arizona Game and Fish has stated that he would like to know more about who killed Yo’oko and where, but the NJP will not say how they obtained the photograph. They work closely with ranchers in northern Mexico, and do not wish to lose their trust. All the NJP is saying is that the photo was taken in Mexico.

This is obviously a tragic event. Yo’oko provided hope to many people, and now he has been killed and skinned. But as Randy Serraglio of the Center for Biological Diversity pointed out, this case shows that jaguars in both the US and Mexico need to be protected.

Click Here for the Original Article by Tony Davis of the Arizona Daily Star

43 Thoughts

    1. I doubt whoever killed Yo’oko was thinking about that at the time. They were probably thinking about the prestige they’d get for killing a jaguar, or about how much they’ve been told about why jaguars are bad. Or perhaps they just saw a jaguar and shot. Rarely do we consider long-term consequences such as extinction, which is a large part of the problem.

      Liked by 3 people

  1. So very sad to read about this. We need to start fencing in the humans not the wilderness. There are places on this world where humans should not go. We should make room for normal food chains and evolution to take place.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I highly doubt that anything will come of this. When it comes to predators like jaguars, anti-poaching laws are rarely enforced. Besides, the Northern Jaguar Project won’t even say who gave them the photo of the skinned jaguar. So even if authorities want to pursue this case, they can’t: not without issuing a subpoena to the NJP.

      Like

        1. It’s a tricky line to navigate. If the NJP seriously pursues this case, they run the risk of losing the local ranchers’ trust. All of their programs are voluntary and heavily dependent upon rancher participation. So if they ranchers don’t trust them, then they won’t be able to do anything for jaguars. It’s the ultimate paradox for community-based conservation.

          Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.