Journey to Belize: Epilogue

Jaguar Wallpaper [Online Image]. Retrieved from http://7-themes.com/6850072-jaguar-wallpaper.html

It has now been over a year since I returned from Belize. As long-time followers of this blog may recall, the whole reason I went to Belize was to look for opportunities to conduct my master’s research there.

When the journey began, I was dead-set on studying the human dimensions of jaguar conservation. That is part of the reason why I met with jaguar experts like Dr. Bart Harmsen and Jamal. Of course, I also genuinely wanted to learn about jaguar conservation in Belize.

The solo portion of my trip proved incredibly fruitful. Nearly everyone pointed me in the same direction: the Central Belize Corridor (CBC). They all agreed that deforestation, particularly within the corridor, was one of the primary threats to jaguars in Belize.

Though brief, my conversation with Dr. Elma Kay of the University of Belize’s Environmental Research Institute (ERI) turned out to be the most influential. She indicated that it would help the ERI if I could figure out why landowners within the CBC (much of which is privately owned) were clearing their land.

I had many fortunate meetings on the campus of the University of Belize, pictured here.

As such, that is what I decided to focus on for my thesis. I spent nearly all of the Fall semester of 2017 trying to design a research project about the drivers of deforestation within the CBC. But the deeper I got into it, the greater the logistical challenges became – especially time.

Returning to Belize to study deforestation within the CBC would have required me to stay in my master’s program for at least a third year, if not longer. When I began working on my master’s degree in 2016, the prospect of taking three years to finish did not bother me. By Fall of 2017, however, I wanted out.

There were other concerns as well, but this is not the time or the place to delve into them.

Furthermore, I had long felt that my primary contribution to wildlife conservation would not come through research; my strengths and interests seemed most suited to communications and public outreach. My time in Belize only affirmed this belief.

I had some time to reflect on where I was going in life while staying at Belmopan Tiny Houses, shown here.

So when it became clear that the CBC research project was no longer the best option, I decided to use my master’s thesis to learn more about environmental communication. At first, I wanted to do a simple literature review about how to write most effectively about the environment for public audiences. But that is not what happened.

A series of unforeseen events led me to focus on a communications medium that I had never anticipated: wildlife television.

While I never expected to take my thesis in this direction, it is strangely appropriate. Unfortunately, I do not have the time to divulge many details about my project or the story behind it just yet. I have an extremely short timeline in which to complete this thesis, so I cannot take many breaks from it.

I will write more about my thesis when I can. For now, all I will say is that I am comparing two very different examples of wildlife television with each other: Planet Earth II and Wild SafariLIVE.

36 Thoughts

    1. Haha, well if we want to get technical Planet Earth isn’t a documentary. Neither is Wild SafariLIVE. It’s literally what the name implies: a wild safari that’s streamed live from South Africa and Kenya. It’s also interactive, in that viewers can send questions to the guides via social media and possibly hear their queries answered live.

      I won’t say that either program is better than the other, because their formats are completely different. But if you want to check out SafariLIVE, here’s a link:

      https://www.nationalgeographic.com/video/safari-live/

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Yeah and you get to watch wildlife television yourself and say it’s for your research! 😂 But I get it, I used to do media studies and would get excited by camera technology, etc.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Haha yep, I get to watch some really well-made films all day and tell people it’s serious academic research ;)

          You used to do media studies? I didn’t know that. I was in a film club in high school, and helped make two very amateur, but feature-length films. Well, technically we only finished one of them. Oops.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. I got to watch random films and say it was for media studies too! And yeah, I did if for my GCSEs! I had to make a little comedy sketch too for my coursework. It was really fun. If I wasn’t down the science path, that’s something I would wanna do!

            Liked by 1 person

  1. wow, I didn’t expect this turn of events :D Wildlife television, awesome! Good luck with your thesis and thank you for keeping us updated :) I’m looking forward to learning more about it!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Well, that’s part of the reasoning behind wildlife-oriented television. I expect the link between watching wildlife programs and advocating for conservation is not direct for most people, however. Different producers also have different intentions. Sir David Attenborough, for instance, has stated that his main goal is to show how wondrous and beautiful the natural world is – thereby helping people to fall in love with it.

      The purpose of my research is to see how certain patterns of messaging within each series might correspond to different values that have previously been found to either encourage or discourage pro-social and pro-environmental behavior. I will explain everything in a (hopefully) simpler format in the future.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Hello Josh,
    Isn’t it amazing (and sometimes bewildering/frustrating) when our journey takes us in a different direction than we anticipated? This sounds like an exciting turn of events and I sincerely wish you continued success and great adventures. I’ve seen both types of nature programmes and each are good in its own ways. It’s like photography — there are so many styles and visions, it’s impossible to say one is better than another ;)

    Best wishes,
    Takami

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks so much for the well wishes Takami, I greatly appreciate it!

      That’s exactly right: these two types of nature programs have different strengths and weaknesses. One has spectacular imagery and concise storytelling, and the other is realistic, unpredictable, and fun. That’s why I always take care the emphasize that it’s impossible to say one program is better than the other when I explain my thesis to people.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.