
I have just read a study by Espinosa, Celis, and Branch that was published last year in PLOS ONE. It examined the effects of road development on jaguar (Panthera onca) conservation in Ecuador, and found, not surprisingly, that more roads equal fewer jaguars.
Background and Study Area
Espinosa et al.’s study took place in Ecuador’s Yasuní Biosphere Reserve, which includes Yasuní National Park and the Waorani Ethnic Reserve. When added together, these areas occupy 18,000 km2 of land, which the study authors collectively labeled “Yasuní.”
As with many protected areas, some portions of Yasuní are more accessible than others. This is linked to the presence of roads, which make it easier for hunters to enter the forest, and facilitate the construction of human settlements within Yasuní.
To determine how accessibility in general – and roads in particular – impacted jaguars, Espinosa et al. measured the abundances of the cats and their prey at multiple sites within Yasuní.
Methods
The authors recorded wildlife densities by placing networks of 23-26 camera traps at four sites in Yasuní that varied in their distances to roads, rivers, and settlements – all of which influence accessibility.
Espinosa et al. let their camera traps run for 90 days in a row at each site. They then used mathematical formulas to convert the images they captured into data, and to generate estimates of jaguar and jaguar prey densities at each location.
Results
The authors found that the more accessible sites had fewer jaguars. While poaching could be part of the problem, Espinosa et al. believed that the jaguar declines they observed were more directly linked to the overhunting of their prey.
Espinosa et al. monitored the abundances of eight jaguar prey species, and seven of them were more scarce at the sites that were closest to roads and settlements; ungulates (hoofed creatures) like peccaries, tapirs, and red-brocket deer were especially hard-hit.
The loss of their prey severely affected jaguars, which were 6-18 times more abundant in the least accessible site than in the most accessible one.
Conclusion
Espinosa et al. had two major conclusions:
- Conservationists and local governments need to work together to avoid building roads in areas that are crucial for jaguars. This includes not only large reserves like Yasuní, but also the corridors that jaguars use to move throughout their range.
- To ensure jaguars’ long-term survival, we need to safeguard their prey. This is why jaguars are “umbrella species:” their conservation requires the strengthening of entire ecosystems.
More Information
This post is but a small summary of Espinosa et al.’s study. Click below to read the original paper for free!
Interesting study, Josh! Roads also have negative impacts on wetlands. I like that people are starting to do research on the impacts of construction (or rather, that I’m just discovering this). I wonder… would elevated roads work better? That way we can leave trees and animals and butterflies and all the good stuff alone while still making our skyways.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Jess, elevated roads might reduce roadkills and better preserve habitat connectivity than traditional roads, but I imagine that the construction process would be longer/more intense. So, I wonder what impacts that would have? Also, in this study, the main issue with roads is that they made it easier for humans to enter the forest, which then led to the overhunting of jaguars’ prey. I don’t know much about elevated roadways, but they might have the same effect. The main solution in Yasuní would seem to be a more regulated hunting system, but I have no idea if the government of Ecuador has the resources to enforce the necessary regulations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with Espinosa building those roads wouldn’t be to bright an idea. The jaguars are too precious for people to be careless about their conservation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yea, I understand that we need roads to function, but building a road through a protected rainforest is a bad idea.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yea and it will always be a bad idea. A road is not worth loosing our lovely animals over.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed!
LikeLiked by 1 person